Comparison
An Asana alternative for when your work starts from a meeting, not a task
This is not a page telling you Asana is bad — it is not, and it is among the best task tools ever built. The difference that matters to you is structural: Asana starts from the task, Diwan starts from the meeting. Which is right for you comes down to one question: where does your work actually originate?
When Asana is the right choice
If your work flows from requests, tickets and long multi-stage projects, your team already works in English, and you need branching automation and boards dense with fields — Asana was built for exactly that, and Diwan will not give you what it gives you.
We say so here rather than in a footnote: a comparison page that never says when the competitor wins is advertising, and the reader knows it from the first line and stops believing the rest.
And when it runs out on you
When the source of your work is a meeting: a committee that meets weekly, decisions taken in session, and items that come out of it. The tool then becomes a task repository with no memory of what preceded them: you open an overdue task and cannot tell which session produced it or which decision justified it — unless someone pasted the link by hand, which is exactly what gets forgotten.
And the minutes then live outside it: a Word file, or a page in a third tool. So you become the thread between meeting, task and file — and when the person who remembered leaves, the thread leaves with them.
What Diwan does differently
-
Minutes inside the tool, not beside it
Agenda, minutes and decision log live in the same product as the tasks, not in a file uploaded to it.
-
The task knows its source
An item born in a set of minutes carries the link to them for as long as it exists, with nobody pasting anything.
-
Arabic by origin, not translated
An interface that reads right-to-left because it was built that way, and search that understands hamza and taa marbuta.
-
And simpler on purpose
No branching automation and no dozens of fields. A tool that needs long training is not used by people who meet once a week.
How to check for yourself in ten minutes
Do not believe this page, and do not believe theirs. Open both tools and ask the same four questions:
-
1 — Where does it start?
Create a meeting with an agenda and minutes. How many steps did it take, and where did the minutes end up living?
-
2 — Does the task know its source?
Turn an item from the minutes into a task, then open it two days later: can you reach the minutes from it in one click?
-
3 — How does it look in Arabic?
Type Arabic text containing numbers and a date, and check line direction, where the full stop lands, and the numbering.
-
4 — What happens to what leaves?
Request a full export of your data. What format is it, and does it include files and minutes or only tasks?
And what you will not find on this page
You will not find a feature table or the competitor's pricing. Product prices and feature lists change monthly, and an outdated comparison becomes a lie through the passage of time alone — and the first person to catch it is the reader who opens both sites. So what we write here is what does not go stale: where each tool starts, and what follows from that.
Related comparisons
Questions about switching
Do we migrate our old tasks?
We advise against it. Start from your next meeting with one committee for four weeks; whatever proves worth migrating gets migrated then, and the rest stays where it is.
Can we use both together?
Yes, and many do: the engineering task tool stays with the technical team, and Diwan handles committee and board meetings and their minutes. We do not ask you to cancel something that works.
What does Diwan not give us today?
Branching automation, boards dense with fields, and integrations with dozens of tools. If that is your first need, a global task tool suits you better — and we will say so in the first session.
Ask us about your case before you switch
One session under an hour, which may well end with us telling you what you already have is enough.
Start free